On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense - Essay ExampleHere he discusses the implication of delivery to our acquisition of go to bedledge. The second department deals with the dual nature of man, i.e. the rational and the spontaneous. He establishes that neither rational nor intuitive man is ever successful in their pursuit of knowledge due to our illusion of truth. Thitherfore, Nietzsche concludes that both we great deal claim to know are interpretations of truth and not truth itself. Analysis In the prototypically part of his work, Nietzsche asserts that The pride connected with knowing and sensing lies like a rank fog over the eye and senses of men, thus deceiving them c at one timerning the value of existence (Nietzsche 451-452). Here, it work outms that Nietzsche is trying to reject any empirical sense of gaining knowledge. For example, I know that I am sitting on a wooden chair because I can see the chair, feel the texture of the wood, touch it, and even smell the aroma of it. But Nietzsche argues that we only perceive the stand up of things, and our senses nowhere lead to the truth (Nietzsche 452). This is what Nietzsche meant by using the analogy of our senses being like a blinding fog over the eyes and thus deceiving us on our knowledge to the highest degree things. But how do we know what is true from what is false? What is truth as opposed to lies? Here, Nietzsche introduces the concept of man as a social being who creates peace among society and forms a general consensus in the process of doing so. He once more establishes his crest by saying that this peace treaty brings in its wake something which appears to be the first step toward acquiring that puzzling truth drive (Nietzsche 452). Furthermore, he argues that a uniformly valid and binding designation is invented for things, and this legislation of language likewise establishes the first laws of truth. For the contrast between truth and lie arises here for the first time (Nietzsche 4 52-453). In other words, Nietzsche establishes his foundation of truth as opposed to lies. Since the development of language, all its representations are, according to Nietzsche, lies. Language is a form of self-deception, which humans have created to convince themselves that the unreal is real. Indeed, Nietzsche asks, Is language the commensurate expression of all realities? (Nietzsche 453). The emphasis here is the one to one correspondence of an object to that of its spoken word. For example, when I a rainbow, the first thing that I associate with it is ruse. Almost anyone would understand me if associate the word color to the object rainbow. However, consider the following scenario what if you were never exposed to color? Since you were born into this world, you were kept inside a house that had only shades of gray. In short, what if the world you consider as real is all in black and white? Now consider that this person saw a rainbow outside his window for the first time, woul d he associate the term color with it? Would he even know what color means? This is the point that Nietzsche wants us to understand regarding language. I quote, It is this way with all of us concerning language we believe that we know something about the things themselves when we speak of trees, colors, snow, and flowers and yet we possess nothing but metaphors for things - metaphors which correspond in no way to the real entities (Nietzsche 454). Thus, Nietzsche concludes that the genesis of language does not proceed logically in any case, and all the material inwardly and with